Boletim Brasileiro de Educação Física
http://boletimef.org

 Pesquisa personalizada

| 日本語 | Ελληνικά | Català | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands |
 
  Quem somos
  Fórum
  Boletim
  Biblioteca Digital
  Currículos
  Links
  Lançamentos
  Eventos
  Contato
  Assinatura
 
 
  Acompanhe o
  BoletimEF no:
Acompanhe as últimas notícias do BoletimEF no Twitter
Participe da comunidade do BoletimEF no Orkut
 
 -Assinatura
Cadastre seu e-mail para receber gratuitamente o Boletim
 
 -Apoio
CBCE
EEFD/UFRJ
 
 

Comparison and cross-validation of anthropometric and bioelectric impedance equations to estimate - Abstract

Como citar este trabalho:

SOUZA, Orivaldo Florencio de; PIRES NETO, Cândido Simões; GUIMARÃES, Fernando José de Sá Pereira. Comparação e validação cruzada de equações antropométricas e de impedância bioelétrica para estimar a massa corporal magra de alunos do NPOR. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 2, p. 193-201, jul/dez. 1998.

> Resumo  > Abstract  
The objective of this study was to compare and validate the estimation of lean body mass (LBM) in students from the Centre for Training of Reserve Officers by means of a body impedance device, anthropometric and body impedance regression equations. Eighteen men aged 18-19 years took part in the study. Anthropometric measurements consisted of weight (kg), height (cm), abdominal girth (abg, cm), horizontal abdominal skinfold (mm) and body density (BD) by means of hydrostatic weighting. Resistance, reactance and MCMVALH values were obtained from a Valhalla 1990B equipment. Pearson correlation, coefficient of determination, linear simple regression, standard error of estimate and, Student paired t-test were used for data analysis. LBMDEN was obtained after BD and was used as criteria and the anthropometric equations of Wilmore and Behnke (1969), Slaughter and Lohman (1980) and BIA equations for LBM developed by Lohman (1992), Segal et alii (1988) and LBMVALH were the predictor. It was found that only the equation of Wilmore and Behnke, WB1, where, LBM = 44.636 + 1.0817*weight - 0.7396*abg, was validated for the estimation of the LBMDENS of the present sample.
 

Download do trabalho completo






 
 
Copyright© 2001-2012 Boletim Brasileiro de Educação Física BoletimEF - Home Topo